Associate of Science in Criminal Justice
The UCJ is currently reviewing this programme for accreditation.
-
Application for Registration – Step 1
The scheduling of a preliminary meeting with the institutionto discuss the quality assurance framework, the requirements of the documentation and the registration process;
The institution’s submission of an Application for Registration;
The processing and review of documents submitted by the institution to determine eligibility for Registration visit.
-
Site Visit – Step 2
The selection and training of an evaluation team for the Registration visit;
The interviewing of relevant stakeholders of the institution on-site and evaluation of the institution’s facilities and resources by the evaluation team.
-
Report Writing – Step 3
The preparation of the Registration report by members of the evaluation team.
-
Institutional Response – Step 4
The Registration report is sent to the President/Principal of the institution for review;
The institution prepares a written response to the UCJ to address the recommendations in the Registration report.
-
Registration Decision – Step 5
The review of the Registration report and the institution’s response by the Accreditation, Curriculum and Development Committee (AC&D) and the submission of a recommendation to Council;
The Council’s review of the recommendation of the AC&D;
Council may delay a decision and ask that the institution address particular issues. In such a case, the application would revert to Step 4 of the process;
The decision of Council is communicated to the institution in writing.
-
Application for Accreditation – Step 6
The scheduling of training of staff of the institution in preparing for accreditation;
The institution’s submission of a completed application for programme accreditation;
The processing and review of documents submitted by the institution to determine eligibility for an accreditation visit.
-
Accreditation Site Visit – Step 7
The selection and training of an evaluation team for the accreditation visit;
The interviewing of relevant stakeholders of the institution including students, graduates and employers of graduates and an evaluation of the institution’s facilities and resources by members of the evaluation team.
-
Report Writing – Step 8
The preparation of the Accreditation report by members of the evaluation team.
-
Institutional Response – Step 9
The Accreditation report is sent to the President/Principal of the institution for review;
The institution prepares a written response to the UCJ to address the recommendations in the Accreditation report.
-
Accreditation Decision – Step 10
The review of the Accreditation report and the Institution’s response by the Accreditation, Curriculum and Development Committee (AC&D) and the submission of recommendation to Council;
The Council’s review of the recommendation of the AC&D;
Council may delay a decision and ask that the institution address particular issues. In such a case, the application would revert to Step 9 of the process;
The decision of Council is communicated to the institution in writing.
Please note that the decision on the above-mentioned programme/s has not yet been determined.
Associate of Science in Law Enforcement Instructions
The UCJ is currently reviewing this programme for accreditation.
-
Application for Registration – Step 1
The scheduling of a preliminary meeting with the institutionto discuss the quality assurance framework, the requirements of the documentation and the registration process;
The institution’s submission of an Application for Registration;
The processing and review of documents submitted by the institution to determine eligibility for Registration visit.
-
Site Visit – Step 2
The selection and training of an evaluation team for the Registration visit;
The interviewing of relevant stakeholders of the institution on-site and evaluation of the institution’s facilities and resources by the evaluation team.
-
Report Writing – Step 3
The preparation of the Registration report by members of the evaluation team.
-
Institutional Response – Step 4
The Registration report is sent to the President/Principal of the institution for review;
The institution prepares a written response to the UCJ to address the recommendations in the Registration report.
-
Registration Decision – Step 5
The review of the Registration report and the institution’s response by the Accreditation, Curriculum and Development Committee (AC&D) and the submission of a recommendation to Council;
The Council’s review of the recommendation of the AC&D;
Council may delay a decision and ask that the institution address particular issues. In such a case, the application would revert to Step 4 of the process;
The decision of Council is communicated to the institution in writing.
-
Application for Accreditation – Step 6
The scheduling of training of staff of the institution in preparing for accreditation;
The institution’s submission of a completed application for programme accreditation;
The processing and review of documents submitted by the institution to determine eligibility for an accreditation visit.
-
Accreditation Site Visit – Step 7
The selection and training of an evaluation team for the accreditation visit;
The interviewing of relevant stakeholders of the institution including students, graduates and employers of graduates and an evaluation of the institution’s facilities and resources by members of the evaluation team.
-
Report Writing – Step 8
The preparation of the Accreditation report by members of the evaluation team.
-
Institutional Response – Step 9
The Accreditation report is sent to the President/Principal of the institution for review;
The institution prepares a written response to the UCJ to address the recommendations in the Accreditation report.
-
Accreditation Decision – Step 10
The review of the Accreditation report and the Institution’s response by the Accreditation, Curriculum and Development Committee (AC&D) and the submission of recommendation to Council;
The Council’s review of the recommendation of the AC&D;
Council may delay a decision and ask that the institution address particular issues. In such a case, the application would revert to Step 9 of the process;
The decision of Council is communicated to the institution in writing.
Please note that the decision on the above-mentioned programme/s has not yet been determined.